This HDD versus SSD NAS running cost calculator compares up to 3-year electricity costs between spinning hard drives and solid-state drives in your NAS based on drive count, wattage difference, and your Australian electricity rate.
Find out exactly how much more (or less) it costs to run SSDs instead of HDDs in your NAS, in Australian dollars per year, with real model comparisons.
The short answer: SSDs use significantly less power than HDDs. The longer answer: for bulk NAS storage, the electricity savings rarely justify the upfront SSD premium within any reasonable timeframe. This calculator gives you the actual numbers for your specific drives and AU electricity rate.
Defaults to Australian rates. See also: NAS Power Cost Calculator and Cloud vs NAS Calculator.
A spinning NAS hard drive (IronWolf, WD Red Plus) draws 4.8 to 10W under load and 3 to 8.2W at idle depending on capacity and model. An equivalent-capacity NAS SSD draws 0.06 to 3.4W active and as little as 0.035 to 1.2W idle. In a 4-drive NAS at typical moderate usage, that difference adds up to roughly 150 to 250 kWh per year. At AU electricity rates of 25 to 42 cents per kWh (depending on state), that is roughly $50 to $90 per year saved by switching to SSDs. For most users, this saving does not justify the upfront premium of SSDs over equal-capacity HDDs — for example, around $136/drive more for a 4TB SSD versus a 4TB HDD in this tool's presets — and the gap widens at higher capacities, where SSD pricing scales up more steeply than HDD pricing.
The maths changes in specific situations. A 2-bay NAS used purely for backup, running spin-down with infrequent access, sees very little active time and HDDs may actually draw less average power than SSDs (which consume their idle wattage continuously). A 4-bay NAS accessed heavily during business hours but running spin-down overnight shifts the calculation significantly. This calculator lets you model your actual usage pattern: active hours, idle hours, and spin-down hours separately.
SSDs make sense in a NAS when noise and vibration matter more than cost: SSDs are silent, HDDs vibrate enough to cause resonance in multi-drive enclosures. They also make sense when drive durability over a 3 to 5 year period is the primary concern: enterprise SSDs have predictable, measurable endurance ratings in TBW (terabytes written), while HDD failure is less predictable. For a home NAS under 16 TB capacity storing photos and documents, the break-even between SSD premium and electricity savings is typically 8 to 20 years, making SSDs a preference choice rather than an economic one.
NVMe SSDs in a NAS M.2 slot (cache tier) are a separate consideration entirely: they serve as a read/write cache for HDDs, combining the fast random I/O of SSD with the bulk capacity of HDD. This calculator covers drive-for-drive running cost only — drive-for-drive is not automatically capacity-for-capacity if you pick presets of different sizes (e.g. 8TB HDDs vs 4TB SSDs). Watch for the capacity note in the Results panel if your two presets don't match in size.
| HDD | SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive cost | - | - |
| Electricity | - | - |
| Total | - | - |
HDD annual kWh/drive = (active% × load W + idle% × idle W + spindown% × spindown W) × 8760 hours ÷ 1000.
SSD annual kWh/drive = SSDs don't spin down, so spindown% collapses into idle%. Formula: (active% × active W + (idle% + spindown%) × idle W) × 8760 ÷ 1000.
Annual cost = drives × kWh/drive × (rate c/kWh ÷ 100).
Break-even = upfront premium (SSD − HDD price per drive × drive count) ÷ annual electricity saving.
Worked example (equal 4TB-per-drive capacity, so this is a like-for-like comparison): 4x Seagate IronWolf 4TB (idle 3.95W / load 4.8W / spindown 0.5W, ~$264/drive) at Moderate profile, NSW 35c/kWh = ~30.4 kWh/drive/year × 4 = ~121.7 kWh → ~$42.59/yr. 4x Samsung 870 EVO 4TB (active 2.5W / idle 0.035W, ~$400/drive) = ~5.71 kWh/drive/year × 4 = ~22.8 kWh → ~$7.99/yr. Annual saving: ~$34.60. Upfront difference: 4 × ($400 − $264) = $544 (SSDs cost more upfront here). Break-even: ~15.7 years. Result: in this equal-capacity example, HDDs remain cheaper overall for any comparison period under ~16 years. If you pick presets of different per-drive capacities (e.g. 8TB HDD vs 4TB SSD), the cost comparison is no longer capacity-for-capacity — check the capacity note in Results, which appears whenever your two presets don't match in size.
At Moderate usage profile (25% load, 55% idle, 20% spindown), 4 drives. Indicative rates, March 2026.
| State | Rate (c/kWh) | 4x IronWolf 8TB (HDD) | 4x Samsung 870 EVO 4TB (SSD) | Annual saving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSW | 35c | $80/yr | $8/yr | $72/yr |
| VIC | 30c | $68/yr | $7/yr | $61/yr |
| QLD | 30c | $68/yr | $7/yr | $61/yr |
| SA | 42c | $96/yr | $10/yr | $86/yr |
| WA | 31c | $71/yr | $7/yr | $64/yr |
| TAS | 28c | $64/yr | $6/yr | $57/yr |
| ACT | 36c | $82/yr | $8/yr | $74/yr |
| NT | 29c | $66/yr | $7/yr | $59/yr |
| Drive | Type | Idle W | Load W | Spindown W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seagate IronWolf 4TB | HDD | 3.95 | 4.8 | 0.5 |
| Seagate IronWolf 8TB | HDD | 7.6 | 8.8 | 0.6 |
| Seagate IronWolf 12TB | HDD | 5.0 | 7.8 | 0.8 |
| WD Red Plus 4TB | HDD | 3.1 | 4.7 | 0.3 |
| WD Red Plus 8TB | HDD | 3.4 | 5.2 | 0.4 |
| WD Red Pro 12TB | HDD | 6.1 | 8.8 | 0.3 |
| Samsung 870 EVO 1TB | SSD | 0.035 | 2.5 | N/A |
| Samsung 870 EVO 2TB | SSD | 0.035 | 2.5 | N/A |
| Samsung 870 EVO 4TB | SSD | 0.035 | 2.5 | N/A |
| Seagate IronWolf 110 480GB | SSD | 1.1 | 2.7 | N/A |
| Seagate IronWolf 110 1.92TB | SSD | 1.2 | 3.4 | N/A |
| WD Red SA500 1TB | SSD | 0.06 | 2.6 | N/A |
| WD Red SA500 2TB | SSD | 0.06 | 3.0 | N/A |
Source: Manufacturer specifications. Actual consumption varies by workload and temperature. Annual cost = drives × kWh/year × electricity rate. Indicative rates, March 2026. Note the state table above compares an 8TB HDD to a 4TB SSD per drive — that's a per-drive running-cost comparison, not an equal-capacity one; use the calculator with matching HDD/SSD capacities for a like-for-like TCO comparison.
Ask us anything about NAS, storage, or infrastructure. We reply by email.
Message sent!
We'll be in touch soon.